美国判案太慢了

神奇女侠需要你出马了，挥动起你的小皮鞭吧

鞭长莫及啊但确实在紧跟新闻，并自学了一下legal system。之前看新闻说美国华人王律师在负责给受害人家属提供法律咨询，新闻图片里王律师满面春风，给人感觉不太靠谱。不少网评说王律师是个移民律师，完全没有刑事案件的经验，不堪重用。但另一些评论说，刑事案在法庭上是检察官和辩护律师之间的较量，王律师无足轻重。我研究了一下，这说法是正确的。对于criminal case，确实是prosecutor和defence lawyer之间的对决，以他们之间的法庭辩论来决定成败的

呃，好像发达国家都是这么慢的。新加坡不也一样吗？去年的中国女生被害案虽然一周就破案了，可是都过去一年了，到现在还没有任何判案的消息。。。

煎熬没办法，一星期算啥，搞不好扯好几年。
白皮国家，讲究程序正义。警方取证的时候稍有瑕疵，证据全部不被采信。
现在的问题是嫌疑人如果自己不交代，找不到受害人的下落，这案子就没法判，只能不停的折腾。

不合理啊社会其他行业都争分夺秒，讲求time to market，凭什么法院可以拖拖拉拉，还收那么高的费用？证据确凿还拖一年甚至几年才判案，简直荒谬，社会进步都被法院拖垮了
应该引入竞争机制，至少两个法院让大家选择。哪个法院判案快大家去哪个法院，让效率低的法院喝西北风去

法庭开战各方仔细看了下新闻，本案法庭各方
prosecutor有两位 - Prosecuting the case are assistant U.S. attorneys Bryan Freres and Eugene Miller, both UI alumni.
defence lawyer - Evan Bruno
Judge - Magistrate Eric Long
目前看来检察官Freres占据主动，有几份录音证据在手对嫌犯不利，不过录音文件并未在法庭播放Freres said, Christensen was heard describing the characteristics of his "ideal victim" and identified people among the crowd who fit that description. Freres did not offer details of how prosecutors obtained a recording of Christensen, nor did he play any recording during the hearing.

Additionally, Freres said Christensen was heard describing how Zhang fought and resisted him while he held her against her will, and threatening someone close to the case. Freres did not specify whom Christensen threatened or what the substance of the threat was.

辩护律师处于守势辩护律师提不出什么有力的反驳证据，法官判嫌犯继续收监，目前为止还算公正 Christensen's attorney Evan Bruno countered that his client had no criminal history. He also argued that because Christensen was being held in a jail more than an hour outside Champaign County, and unable to speak to his attorneys by phone, he was being denied his rights to assist with his defense.

Long disagreed, saying the logistic issues Bruno detailed "are simply not for today." Long also told Christensen that his lack of a criminal history would have favored him in an argument for bail "in a different case," but he pointed to the evidence of Zhang last being seen in his car and him being caught on tape detailing the alleged kidnapping as reason enough to keep him in custody.

还有一位辩护律师但另一位辩护律师Tom Bruno（怎么也姓Bruno，难道是兄弟俩）则对检方证据不以为然，认为那算不上什么真正的证据，并寄望于下次cross examination时找检方漏洞。为恶人辩护的律师脑回路和良心都真是异于常人啊
Christensen's other lawyer, Tom Bruno, discounted the prosecution's assertions.

"I would say it's not really evidence at all yet," Tom Bruno said. "One of the founding principles of the American system of justice is the right to confront and cross-examine the witnesses against you. There was certainly no cross examination when it's a one-sided recitation of what the government hopes to prove."

发达国家讲究民主凡事人权第一，犯罪嫌疑人在被定罪之前，只是嫌疑人，要充分保障嫌疑人的人权。。。

发达国家何必太慈悲对犯罪嫌疑人的仁慈就是对受害者及家属的残忍。等着看，发达国家迟早会因这种过度的仁慈和施舍而衰退

我们国家倒是判案很快结果一大堆冤假错案

两个都不好需要折衷一下