#该来的总会来# 林厝港烧尸案下判 “冒牌”洗衣店少东被判终身监禁

功夫熊猫  •   •  19530 次浏览

(早报讯)林厝港烧尸案今早下判,“冒牌”洗衣店少东邱贵福被判终身监禁。

这起轰动一时的命案发生于2016年7月12日上午8时以后,31岁的中国籍女子崔雅洁在停放于滨海花园通道的一辆黑色宝马轿车内遭杀害。

被告邱贵福涉嫌杀人后移尸到林厝港8巷,买了大量木炭与煤油,花上三天时间焚烧尸体,确保彻底毁尸灭迹。

案件今年3月开审,前后举行了11天的审讯。高庭法官林茵倩今年7月判他谋杀罪名成立,今早判他终身监禁。

https://t.ly/2EV9k

25 条回复
  • #1

    竟然不用杀人偿命

  • vitesse
    #2

    绞刑都没有这狗屁法律

  • #3

    死刑欧盟会抗议你懂的

  • #4

    这么恶劣的杀人刑事案件都不处以极刑变相鼓励多杀人吗

  • #5

    EUSFTA了解一下The European Union-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (EUSFTA) is the first FTA concluded between the EU and an ASEAN country.

    如果因为一个死刑,欧盟取消了这个贸易协定,不知诸位如何选择?

  • 功夫熊猫 楼主
    #6

    目测撕逼大战一触即发

  • 功夫熊猫 楼主
    #7

    层主觉得这个case竟然不是虐杀?

  • 羊驼君
    #8

    这个判的比美国轻表现好可能还可以减刑

  • xiaoleic
    #9

    浪费我的钱......

  • alexwee
    #10

    大法官解释过终身监禁现在的终身监禁就是终身监禁,再也没有减刑了。

  • #11

    都烧成碎块了当然爱这么说怎么说了。不就欺负死者不能反驳么。

    以后虐杀残杀的一把火就没事了。

  • beerguy
    #12

    表现好的话, 7扣8扣, 16-18年后可以出来

  • xiaoleic
    #13

    真的假的?给个reference?可不要散布fake news...

  • yuanman66
    #14

    天天煽火……孜孜不倦
    哈哈哈……

  • 羊驼君
    #15

    涨姿势了谢谢层主解读

  • 羊驼君
    #16

    50岁连鞭刑就逃过了真是爽歪歪

  • yaoyao8
    #17

    最近几年严重罪案的判例真是很让人失望

  • #18

    失了民心得不偿失判个死缓意思一下也好啊

  • #19

    死不足惜。还要浪费纳税人的养着她。可怜的女同胞!

  • #20

    一直有这种感觉关17-18年,比死刑还痛苦。。。

  • #21

    人命都是不一样的,本地人和外地人不一样本国人和外国人也不一样
    外国人和外国人也不一样

  • beerguy
    #22

    大学里面没有学吗? 一般life sentence都是20年, 扣掉公共假期, 还有表现好可以提前假释

    However, when the Plaintiff sought clarification from the Singapore Prison Service (who sought advice from the Attorney-General’s Chambers) and Minister for Law, he was told that “life imprisonment” as stated in the commutation order should be construed as imprisonment for his remaining natural life. He thus filed a criminal motion, seeking a declaration that his sentence, based on a proper interpretation of the commutation order, should be for 20 years instead.

    To put matters in perspective, there had been a longstanding practice that “life imprisonment” meant 20 years’ imprisonment, with the possibility of remission. This only changed in August 1997, when the Court of Appeal in Abdul Nasir bin Ameh Hamsah v Public Prosecutor (“Abdul Nasir”) held that a term of “life imprisonment” ought to be accorded its natural and ordinary meaning, ie, imprisonment for the duration of the prisoner’s natural life. Notably, the Court of Appeal said that its ruling would only have prospective effect, in that it would affect “only those offences which carry a life sentence committed after the date of delivery of this judgment”; it added that “should the offence be committed before the date of this judgment, the old practice of 20 years imprisonment would continue to apply to those offenders.”
    This paper has been withdrawn.

  • xiaoleic
    #23

    我觉得你贴的这段话的意思就是说, life imprisonment==死在监狱不是吗?

  • beerguy
    #24

    我觉得新加坡政府不会花钱去养这种人一辈子的

  • xiaoleic
    #25

    希望不会。。。。。。。

狮城帮

狮城帮是关于分享和探索新加坡的地方

马上注册

已注册用户请 登录