开发商玩脱了? 所以要大跳水了吗? Normanton Park hit with ‘no-sale licence'
功夫熊猫 • • 22520 次浏览居然还可以有这样的操作的后果就是开发商得自己出钱盖好了才能卖的后果就是开发商岂不是很多年压力很大的后果就是可能急于大跳水甩卖的后果就是最后又是人山人海去捡漏的后果??
via https://bre.is/lt9hkxuvC
KINGSFORD Huray Development has been hit with a no-sale licence for its project at the former Normanton Park site, prohibiting it from selling units before the Temporary Occupation Permit (TOP) is obtained.
In June, Kingsford Huray was granted approval for a 1,882-unit project on the site, comprising 1,863 apartments and 19 strata terrace houses. But the Controller of Housing (COH) issued a no-sale licence for the project on Jan 15, "as the company had failed to meet the requirements for a sale licence", said an Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) spokesman in response to queries from The Business Times.
He said the Building and Construction Authority (BCA) had found that at the developer's other project Kingsford Waterbay, some building works such as windows, barriers and common storey shelter "had deviated from requirements under the Building Control Act and Regulations".
"Feedback received from buyers of Kingsford Hillview Peak, another project by the company, was also taken into consideration," the spokesman added.
In December 2017, Kingsford Waterbay was issued with an order to stop building works. This was lifted only after rectification works were completed. Separately, in July 2017, Kingsford Huray was fined S$130,000 under the Workplace Safety and Health Act for repeated safety lapses at its Hillview Peak worksite.
Developers with a no-sale licence can begin construction but cannot sell units off-plan without approval from the COH.
After TOP is obtained, the developer will still need to apply to the COH to convert its licence into a sale licence before units can be sold. A no-sale licence can also be converted before TOP is obtained, if the developer is able to satisfy the criteria to qualify for a sale licence.
In assessing any application for a Housing Developer's Licence, the COH will consider various factors, including the developer's track record, said the URA spokesman. "Where necessary, the COH may issue a licence with conditions to ensure that the interests of home buyers are duly protected."
The no-sale licence for the Normanton Park project, publicly available on the URA's website, includes conditions such as strict compliance with the Housing Developers (Control & Licensing) Act (Cap. 130) and the Housing Developers Rules.
Another condition is that none of the units may be sold without the COH's prior approval in writing. Kingsford Huray must also obtain Quality Mark certificates for all units in the housing development, and do so before making any application to the Controller to sell them.
In general, such a requirement is "so that home buyers can be assured that their housing units are constructed and finished to a reasonable standard of quality", said the spokesman.
Under the Normanton Park project's no-sale licence, the COH must also be informed within 14 days of any changes to persons holding responsible positions in Kingsford Huray, and any changes to the particulars of the developer and/or the project, as set out in the licence.
In October 2017, Normanton Park was sold to Kingsford Huray for S$830.1 million, in one of Singapore's biggest en bloc purchases at the time. This came with an estimated S$231.1 million additional payment to top up the lease to 99 years.
Also payable was a fee of about S$283.4 million to redevelop the site to a gross plot ratio of 2.1 based on the maximum permissible gross floor area of about 1.39 million square feet. This translated to a land price of about S$969 per square foot per plot ratio.
-
#1
毛估估甩卖也逃不掉5年罚税时间太短了。
如果那时候资金回笼压力大,就只能折价卖,但估计是躲不开absd。
如果资金还是很充裕,也可以慢慢卖。 不亏为主。
不过都太挑战了。 -
功夫熊猫 楼主#2
沙发,目测层主对躲避absd的方法知道的太少了。。。
-
#3
我看这次搞不好要跑路了军人到发展商 崔正锋宁当独行侠
2019年4月7日 3:30 AM
文/周文龙摄影/林国明
来自中国沈阳的鑫丰地产创办人兼董事长崔正锋,人生遭遇曲折而充满传奇。
他曾经是贫困的农民,是军队里的军人,如今却是本地实力雄厚的发展商。
https://www.zaobao.com/zfinance/personalities/story20190407-946558?xtor=CS2-8 -
#4
努把力应该可以吧A no-sale licence can also be converted before TOP is obtained, if the developer is able to satisfy the criteria to qualify for a sale licence.
不过这样的新闻出来会把名声弄坏,价格不好就难卖出 -
#5
这厮把大天朝的那套用来小新玩,把自己给玩残了
-
#6
看新闻貌似这个发展商很多恨招偷偷修改设计, 施工无视安全啥的。 每个项目都是问题项目。
这样的房子,便宜也不敢买啊 ,估计政府也是衡量利弊,干脆不给他卖了,不然建个危楼,烂尾楼,发展商收完钱溜了, 政府最后还得擦屁股 -
#7
而且在小新也没找个给力的靠山
-
#8
这边房价稳定买房多是住的,不像国内飞涨,再烂都有人买
-
#9
真有你的,把小新的屋主当凯子了,看过来集体出售破局公寓住户索赔 发展商申请撤销诉讼遭驳回
-
#10
首先觉得政府是该治一下 然后看看对发展商的影响。不要上来就扣帽子。买地8.3亿TOP UP lease 花费2.31亿。调高总开发楼面面积花费2.83亿。
总楼面开发面积1390000呎。
目前土地成本 970每平方呎。开发成本500块每呎(包含建筑,利息,法律,推广)。回本价格大概1470每呎。
考虑5年内,不能卖掉所有的单位,ABSD 15%是1.3亿。平摊到每呎93块。回本价格是1560每呎。
目前附近的新项目 Kent Ridge Hill Residence 售出153个单位 均价 1708psf,注意这是期房的价格。
有了这些数字后,来看看这个惩罚的影响。最直接的有两个:
1. 销售时间变短(3年建好,距离5年absd remission 大限只剩下两年)后果是,成本每呎增加93块。那么问题来了。现房比期房平均贵7万( 最低平均面积70平米来计算) 是否合理。这个得买家问自己了。这个决定ABSD的成本是否能够回收/转嫁。
2. 没有办法拿买家的钱开发了。这个对Return on Equity的影响是巨大的。如果可以在TOP前销售,开盘就可以回收20%。设想开盘价格1700, 20%就已经340每呎了。假设头三年,可以出售50%的单位,建筑进度达到50%。那么平均每呎回收资金就是1700*0.5/2 = 425psf。完全够发展商把房子建起来了。而且这笔钱425psf对发展商来说是free money。一分钱利息都不用给的。
现在没办法拿到free money了。那么开发的500块,总结500*1390000= 6.95亿,需要发展商从其他渠道融资了。
换句话说,政府禁止了该发展商的销售许可,成本就是3年来总融资6.95亿的融资成本。
这个就需要金融大拿们给个指标了。如果按照年利息10%,分三年发放,毛估估 大约1.3亿。平摊到每呎的成本93块。
保本价格从1560增加到1650psf。
说再多,最重要的其实是,这个现房均价1800psf到底有没有机会。有机会,那就能融到钱。机会越大,融资成本月低。机会越低,融资成本反而会越高。 -
#11
忘记回复楼主就算发展商跳水,也得等建好了才卖。
跳水的目的通常是为了增加销售速度,避免ABSD 以及融资成本。
ABSD成本是93块每呎。也就是为了ABSD 降价幅度不宜超过100。而现实中按照过往经验,降价100 或者5%-7%并不足以在短时间内清空整个库存。而且考虑买家普遍买涨不买跌的心态,低开高走,逐步推盘比较合理。完全想避免这笔成本基本是没希望了。
所以最终的决定因素还是市场价格和融资成本。并且这两者是相互作用的。 -
#12
有了负面新闻以后本地银行的RM们倾向于不给这个项目放贷但是肯定也有RM会做,就看发展商和银行的关系了,可能需要从不止一家银行融资。如果倒霉遇到金融危机的话基本上就可以肯定融不到资了。
开发商缺钱的话只能盖的时候这里省省那里省省了,不管怎么说也要混过TOP。 -
#13
看了新闻好像他家建的kingsford hillview peak被业主集体投诉,质量很差,真想不到在这边买房子还会有这样的问题,这些倒霉的业主也真糟心。
-
#14
怕是省不了,因为TOP之后并不是可以自动开卖仍然须要向政府重新申请sales license,如果建筑质量还是不过关,怕是会继续被delay。如果发展商能撑到TOP,估计这个盘的质量应该不错的。
-
#15
融资不一定就非是银行发展商要是买地都给了一半的钱,无论如何,银行也是敢借钱的。土地怎么折腾也不会贬值50%。
何况融资不一定是非要是银行。包括国内外的私募,本地建筑公司发展商都敢入股。
越是这种情况,建筑质量发展商反而不敢玩花样了。现房买家,又出了这档子事,大家会拿着放大镜去看房。 -
#16
那就要看开发商自己怎么想了之前拿地的钱不也是融资的,本来也指着赶紧卖房子一笔一笔还的,银行不可能因为你出了这事就不收利息了。其实还是看金融环境和开发商自己的现金流,反正名字臭了以后很多人就不敢碰了。当然现在金融机构也不好做生意而且机构们手里又都有钱,开发商的风险没有hit到线肯定还是有人愿意做的,前提是kingsford不要又卷进去别的新闻了。
-
#17
其实我的计算里面已经说清楚了,目前发展商主要是需要开发资金。至于土地融资成本,有没有销售许可,都是固定那里的。
没有TOP销售获得的资金,并不能用来偿还土地融资成本。这是政府的规定。
发展商这次铁定ROE会降的超级厉害,因为必须自己加大投入或者高成本融资。
最理想的是引进其他发展商合作。
价格跳水根本解决不了目前的问题。