NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., a nationally recognized shareholder rights law firm, is investigating potential claims against DiDi Global, Inc. (NYSE: DIDI) on behalf of DiDi stockholders. Our investigation concerns whether DiDi has violated the federal securities laws and/or engaged in other unlawful business practices.
“[p]ursuant to the PRC's Cybersecurity Law, the CAC notified app stores to take down the ‘DiDi Chuxing’ app in China[.]”
Tweet this
Click here to participate in the action.
On or about June 30, 2021, DiDi Global completed its IPO, issuing 316.8 million American Depositary Shares at $14.
Within days, on July 2, 2021, the company disclosed China’s Cyberspace Administration Office is conducting a cybersecurity review of the company and required it to suspend new user registration in China.
On July 4, 2021, the Company issued a press release entitled “DiDi Announces App Takedown in China” which announced that: “the CAC [Cyberspace Administration of China] stated that it was reported and confirmed that the ‘DiDi Chuxing’ app had the problem of collecting personal information in violation of relevant PRC laws and regulations.” The press release further stated that “[p]ursuant to the PRC's Cybersecurity Law, the CAC notified app stores to take down the ‘DiDi Chuxing’ app in China[.]”
On July 5, 2021, the Wall Street Journal published an article entitled “Chinese Regulators Suggested Didi Delay Its U.S. IPO: Ride-hailing giant, under pressure to reward shareholders, pushed ahead with NYSE listing despite concerns of China’s cybersecurity watchdog” which reported, among other things, that “[w]eeks before Didi Global Inc. [] went public in the U.S., China’s cybersecurity watchdog suggested the Chinese ride-hailing giant delay its initial public offering and urged it to conduct a thorough self-examination of its network security[.]”
On this news, the Company’s American Depositary Shares (“ADS”) price fell $3.04 per ADS, or nearly 20%, to close at $12.49 per ADS on July 6, 2021, the next trading day.
If you purchased or otherwise acquired DiDi shares and suffered a loss, are a long-term stockholder, have information, would like to learn more about these claims, or have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Brandon Walker, Melissa Fortunato, or Marion Passmore by email at [email protected], telephone at (212) 355-4648, or by filling out this contact form. There is no cost or obligation to you.
---
-
#1
红头文件都来了
2021年7月6日,中共中央办公厅、国务院办公厅印发了《关于依法从严打击证券违法活动的意见》
《意见》核心焦点大致可概括为:
1、确立清晰的时间表,2022年执法司法体制和协调配合机制初步建立,2025年良好资本市场生态全面形成。
2、加强跨境监管合作,加强中概股监管。完善数据安全、涉密信息管理。
3、完善全方位追责体系,强化退市等市场约束;加强执法合作,重点关注大案要案、非法证券活动、债券市场、私募市场四大领域等。
-
#2
啥意思?米国号召本国韭菜找Didi算账?
-
小花16 楼主#3
对的赢官司有钱才给律师费呢。
-
小花16 楼主#4
说明滴滴没有违法?意见说2022建立框架
-
#5
大杯具昨晚各中概股大跌
-
小花16 楼主#6
Rosen Law Firm Files Securities Class Action Lawsuit Against DiDi Global Inc.再来
Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces it has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of the securities of DiDi Global Inc. (NYSE: DIDI) pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement and related prospectus (collectively, the “Registration Statement”) issued in connection with DiDi’s June 2021 initial public offering (the “IPO”). The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for DiDi investors under the federal securities laws.
To join the DiDi class action, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2113.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] or [email protected] for information on the class action.
NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN ONE. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT. AN INVESTOR’S ABILITY TO SHARE IN ANY POTENTIAL FUTURE RECOVERY IS NOT DEPENDENT UPON SERVING AS LEAD PLAINTIFF.
According to the lawsuit, the Registration Statement featured false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) DiDi “had the problem of collecting personal information in violation of relevant PRC laws and regulations”; (2) DiDi’s app, DiDi Chuxing (Travel), would face an imminent cybersecurity review by the Cyberspace Administration of China (“CAC”); (3) the CAC would require all Chinese app stores to remove DiDi Chuxing; and (4) as a result, defendants’ statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than September 7, 2021. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2113.html or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Phillip Kim, Esq. of Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected].
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm or on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm.
Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm’s attorneys are ranked and recognized by numerous independent and respected sources. Rosen Law Firm has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for investors.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. -
#7
好像class action官司可以打很久吧?慢慢看。。
-
#8
应该的,这明显是割韭菜第一天换手,明显倒货
-
#9
好几年也不容易赢
滴滴有点特殊,刚上市就爆 -
#10
是, 惨不忍睹。、、、
-
#11
和我有毛关系呢又没割到我!
我有义务说吗? 有吗?!
还是您在等我的消息
呵呵呵
百度起飞就又坠落了。。。。 -
#12
原来 真是要套我的说法啊不说了
也不贴了
昨夜6入了mitq 当天24套现
16.90carv 36套现
说说很容易
一周赚了一年的花费
太容易啊